CET4作文评分人混合型反馈的效果研究

CET4作文评分人混合型反馈的效果研究

分享

作者: 徐鹰著

出版社: 华南理工大学出版社

出版时间: 2014-08

版次: 1

ISBN: 9787562343608

定价: 40.00

装帧: 平装

开本: 16开

纸张: 胶版纸

页数: 225页

正文语种: 英语

分类: 语言文字

1人买过

　　《CET4作文评分人混合型反馈的效果研究》是对大学英语四级考级（CET4）作文评分周期内对评分人混合型反馈的有效性的系统性研究，旨在探讨评分混合型反馈能否帮助评分人获得评分技能的理论和实践问题。评分人反馈是评分人培训中常用的一种方法，是保证考试信\效度的重要手段。《CET4作文评分人混合型反馈的效果研究》不仅包括对分数的多层面RASCH模型分析结果，还增加专家评分人的给分理据。此外还采用了基于有声思维的质性研究手段，力求建立中国特定考试评分背时景下评分人的培训和反馈的新型模式。 Chapter1Introduction
1.1Backgroundofthestudy
1.2Purposeofthestudyandresearchquestions
1.3Significanceofthestudy
1.3.1Theoreticalsignificance
1.3.2Methodologicalsignificance
1.3.3Practicalsignificance
1.4Anoteonterms
1.4.1Mockessays
1.4.2Ratereffects/variability/biases/errors
1.4.3Ratingaccuracy
1.4.4Scoring/scorevalidity
1.4.5Scoring/ratingexpertise
1.4.6Cognitivestrategy
1.4.7Meta-cognitivestrategy
1.4.8Ratingsession
1.4.9Feedbackiteration
1.4.10Counter-balanceddesign
1.4.11Thecorrelationcoefficient
1.4.12Themixedfeedback
1.5Thestructureofchapters

Chapter2Literaturereview
2.1Introduction
2.2Ratervariabilityasaseriousthreattoscorevalidityinperformanceassessments
2.2.1Modelsofperformanceassessmentofwriting
2.2.2Factorsthataffectraterperformance
2.2.3Ratervariabilityfromthepsychometricperspective
2.2.4Ratervariabilityfromthehermeneuticperspective
2.2.5Ratercognitionstudies
2.3Ratertrainingasaroutinemeasuretocontrolratervariability
2.3.1Overviewofproceduresofratertraining
2.3.2Studiesonratertrainingeffectiveness
2.3.3Criticalissuesinratertraining
2.4Raterfeedbackasanimportantpartoftraining
2.4.1Studiesonraterfeedbackeffectiveness
2.4.2Somecommonproblems
2.5Methodologicalconsiderations
2.5.1Contentofthefeedback
2.5.2Deliveryofthefeedback
2.6Summary

Chapter3Method
3.1Introduction
3.2ResearchDesign
3.2.1Themixedmethodsdesignofthisstudy
3.2.2Thequasi-experimentalnatureofthisstudy
3.2.3Contextofthestudy
3.2.4Materials
3.2.5Participants
3.2.6Instruments
3.2.7Pilotstudy
3.2.8Procedures
3.3Dataanalysis
3.3.1MFRManalysisofratings
3.3.2Analysisofdegreeofcertainty
3.3.3Verbalprotocolanalysis
3.3.4Thequestionnaireofraters'perceptionsofmixed'feedback
3.3.5Thequestionnaireofraters'evaluationoffeedbackeffectiveness
3.3.6Interviewwiththosewhoarenegativewiththefeedbackeffectiveness
3.4Summary

Chapter4Results
4.1FindingsforResearchQuestion1:Theeffectofthemixedfeedbackonratervariability
4.1.1FindingsforRQ1（1）:Theeffectofthemixedfeedbackonraterseverity
4.1.2FindingsforRQ1（2）:Theeffectofthemixedfeedbackonraterinternalconsistency
4.1.3FindingsforRQ1（3）:Theeffectofthemixedfeedbackonraterbias
4.1.4FindingsforRQ1（4）:Theeffectofthemixedfeedbackonratercentraltendency
4.1.5FindingsforRQ1（5）:TheeffectofthemixedfeedbackonraterseverityDRIFT
4.2FindingsforResearchQuestion2:TheextenttowhichEGraterscanincorporatethemixedfeedbackintoratingbehaviorwhenitisprovidedrepeatedlyover3iterations
4.2.1Firstroundresults
4.2.2Secondroundresults
4.3FindingsforResearchQuestion3.Theeffectofthemixedfeedbackonraters'degreeofcertaintyfortheirratings
4.3.1Firstroundresults
4.3.2Secondroundresults
4.4FindingsforResearchQuestion4.Theeffectofthemixedfeedbackonraters'decision.making
4.4.1FindingsforRQ4（1）:Theeffectofthemixedfeedbackonraters'decision-makingintermsoftextfeatures
4.4.2FindingsforRQ4（2）:Theeffectofthemixedfeedbackonraters'decision-makingintermsofinformationprocessingbehaviors
4.5FindingsforResearchQuestion5:Raters'perceptionsofthemixedfeedback...
4.5.1Firstroundresults
4.5.2Secondroundresults
4.6Summary

Chapter5Discussion
5.1DiscussionofResearchQuestion1:Whateffectdoesthemixedfeedbackhaveonratervariability7
5.1.1Methodologicalconsiderations
5.1.2Interpretationoftheresults
5.2DiscussionofResearchQuestion2.TowhatextentcanEGratersincorporatethemixedfeedbackintoratingbehaviorwhenitisprovidedrepeatedlyover3iterations7
5.2.1Methodologicalconsiderations
5.2.2Interpretationoftheresults
5.3DiscussionofResearchQuestion3:Whateffectdoesthemixedfeedbackhaveonraters'degreeofcertaintyfortheirratings7
5.3.1Methodologicalconsiderations
5.3.2Interpretationoftheresults
5.4DiscussionofResearchQuestion4:Whateffectdoesthemixedfeedbackhaveonraters'decision-making?
5.4.1Methodologicalconsiderations
5.4.2Interpretationoftheresults
5.5DiscussionofResearchQuestion5:Whatareraters'perceptionsofsuchfeedback?
5.5.1Methodologicalconsiderations
5.5.2Interpretationoftheresults
5.6Generaldiscussion:Establishaninternallinkbetweenfindings
5.6.1LinkingfindingsofRQ1,RQ3andRQ4
5.6.2LinkingfindingsofRQ1,RQ3,RQ4andRQ5
5.7Summary

Chapter6Conclusions
6.1Summaryoffindings
6.2Implicationsofthestudy
6.2.1Theoreticalimplications
6.2.2Methodologicalimplications
6.2.3Practicalimplications
6.3Limitationsofthestudyanddirectionforfutureresearch
References
Appendices
内容简介:
　　《CET4作文评分人混合型反馈的效果研究》是对大学英语四级考级（CET4）作文评分周期内对评分人混合型反馈的有效性的系统性研究，旨在探讨评分混合型反馈能否帮助评分人获得评分技能的理论和实践问题。评分人反馈是评分人培训中常用的一种方法，是保证考试信\效度的重要手段。《CET4作文评分人混合型反馈的效果研究》不仅包括对分数的多层面RASCH模型分析结果，还增加专家评分人的给分理据。此外还采用了基于有声思维的质性研究手段，力求建立中国特定考试评分背时景下评分人的培训和反馈的新型模式。
目录:
Chapter1Introduction
1.1Backgroundofthestudy
1.2Purposeofthestudyandresearchquestions
1.3Significanceofthestudy
1.3.1Theoreticalsignificance
1.3.2Methodologicalsignificance
1.3.3Practicalsignificance
1.4Anoteonterms
1.4.1Mockessays
1.4.2Ratereffects/variability/biases/errors
1.4.3Ratingaccuracy
1.4.4Scoring/scorevalidity
1.4.5Scoring/ratingexpertise
1.4.6Cognitivestrategy
1.4.7Meta-cognitivestrategy
1.4.8Ratingsession
1.4.9Feedbackiteration
1.4.10Counter-balanceddesign
1.4.11Thecorrelationcoefficient
1.4.12Themixedfeedback
1.5Thestructureofchapters

Chapter2Literaturereview
2.1Introduction
2.2Ratervariabilityasaseriousthreattoscorevalidityinperformanceassessments
2.2.1Modelsofperformanceassessmentofwriting
2.2.2Factorsthataffectraterperformance
2.2.3Ratervariabilityfromthepsychometricperspective
2.2.4Ratervariabilityfromthehermeneuticperspective
2.2.5Ratercognitionstudies
2.3Ratertrainingasaroutinemeasuretocontrolratervariability
2.3.1Overviewofproceduresofratertraining
2.3.2Studiesonratertrainingeffectiveness
2.3.3Criticalissuesinratertraining
2.4Raterfeedbackasanimportantpartoftraining
2.4.1Studiesonraterfeedbackeffectiveness
2.4.2Somecommonproblems
2.5Methodologicalconsiderations
2.5.1Contentofthefeedback
2.5.2Deliveryofthefeedback
2.6Summary

Chapter3Method
3.1Introduction
3.2ResearchDesign
3.2.1Themixedmethodsdesignofthisstudy
3.2.2Thequasi-experimentalnatureofthisstudy
3.2.3Contextofthestudy
3.2.4Materials
3.2.5Participants
3.2.6Instruments
3.2.7Pilotstudy
3.2.8Procedures
3.3Dataanalysis
3.3.1MFRManalysisofratings
3.3.2Analysisofdegreeofcertainty
3.3.3Verbalprotocolanalysis
3.3.4Thequestionnaireofraters'perceptionsofmixed'feedback
3.3.5Thequestionnaireofraters'evaluationoffeedbackeffectiveness
3.3.6Interviewwiththosewhoarenegativewiththefeedbackeffectiveness
3.4Summary

Chapter4Results
4.1FindingsforResearchQuestion1:Theeffectofthemixedfeedbackonratervariability
4.1.1FindingsforRQ1（1）:Theeffectofthemixedfeedbackonraterseverity
4.1.2FindingsforRQ1（2）:Theeffectofthemixedfeedbackonraterinternalconsistency
4.1.3FindingsforRQ1（3）:Theeffectofthemixedfeedbackonraterbias
4.1.4FindingsforRQ1（4）:Theeffectofthemixedfeedbackonratercentraltendency
4.1.5FindingsforRQ1（5）:TheeffectofthemixedfeedbackonraterseverityDRIFT
4.2FindingsforResearchQuestion2:TheextenttowhichEGraterscanincorporatethemixedfeedbackintoratingbehaviorwhenitisprovidedrepeatedlyover3iterations
4.2.1Firstroundresults
4.2.2Secondroundresults
4.3FindingsforResearchQuestion3.Theeffectofthemixedfeedbackonraters'degreeofcertaintyfortheirratings
4.3.1Firstroundresults
4.3.2Secondroundresults
4.4FindingsforResearchQuestion4.Theeffectofthemixedfeedbackonraters'decision.making
4.4.1FindingsforRQ4（1）:Theeffectofthemixedfeedbackonraters'decision-makingintermsoftextfeatures
4.4.2FindingsforRQ4（2）:Theeffectofthemixedfeedbackonraters'decision-makingintermsofinformationprocessingbehaviors
4.5FindingsforResearchQuestion5:Raters'perceptionsofthemixedfeedback...
4.5.1Firstroundresults
4.5.2Secondroundresults
4.6Summary

Chapter5Discussion
5.1DiscussionofResearchQuestion1:Whateffectdoesthemixedfeedbackhaveonratervariability7
5.1.1Methodologicalconsiderations
5.1.2Interpretationoftheresults
5.2DiscussionofResearchQuestion2.TowhatextentcanEGratersincorporatethemixedfeedbackintoratingbehaviorwhenitisprovidedrepeatedlyover3iterations7
5.2.1Methodologicalconsiderations
5.2.2Interpretationoftheresults
5.3DiscussionofResearchQuestion3:Whateffectdoesthemixedfeedbackhaveonraters'degreeofcertaintyfortheirratings7
5.3.1Methodologicalconsiderations
5.3.2Interpretationoftheresults
5.4DiscussionofResearchQuestion4:Whateffectdoesthemixedfeedbackhaveonraters'decision-making?
5.4.1Methodologicalconsiderations
5.4.2Interpretationoftheresults
5.5DiscussionofResearchQuestion5:Whatareraters'perceptionsofsuchfeedback?
5.5.1Methodologicalconsiderations
5.5.2Interpretationoftheresults
5.6Generaldiscussion:Establishaninternallinkbetweenfindings
5.6.1LinkingfindingsofRQ1,RQ3andRQ4
5.6.2LinkingfindingsofRQ1,RQ3,RQ4andRQ5
5.7Summary

Chapter6Conclusions
6.1Summaryoffindings
6.2Implicationsofthestudy
6.2.1Theoreticalimplications
6.2.2Methodologicalimplications
6.2.3Practicalimplications
6.3Limitationsofthestudyanddirectionforfutureresearch
References
Appendices

查看详情

相关分类

语言学汉语中国少数民族语言英语法语德语西班牙语俄语日语阿拉伯语韩语汉藏语系阿尔泰语系印欧语系

CET4作文评分人混合型反馈的效果研究

八五品

墨渊轩图书专营店的书店

广东省东莞市

平均发货9小时成功完成率92.41%

￥17.40

券

100减20

立即购买加入购物车
CET4作文评分人混合型反馈的效果研究

八品

孔龙书社A

广东省东莞市

平均发货9小时成功完成率94.5%

￥17.40

券

100减20

立即购买加入购物车不属于本条目
CET4作文评分人混合型反馈的效果研究

八五品

忻源星

广东省东莞市

平均发货8小时成功完成率94.34%

￥17.40

券

100减20

立即购买加入购物车
CET4作文评分人混合型反馈的效果研究

八品

九八书店

广东省东莞市

平均发货15小时成功完成率93.91%

￥6.00

券

100减20

立即购买加入购物车