未读消息消息

购物车

我的订单

个人中心

店铺

我的订单收藏

拍卖

拍卖交易我的竞拍收藏

我的好友资金账户

卖家中心

客服 |

帮助中心 9:00-20:30 在线留言

客服电话

010-89648155

服务时间

客服咨询 8:00-21:00

纠纷处理 9:00-21:00

图书审核 9:00-18:00

监督与建议

请选择

手机孔网

刑事程序中的透明性与正当性——摆脱对抗制的教条

作者: 张帅著

出版社: 清华大学出版社

出版时间: 2021-07

版次: 1

ISBN: 9787302582250

定价: 98.00

装帧: 平装

开本: 16开

纸张: 胶版纸

页数: 284页

分类: 法律

8 张插图图片

6人买过

来自英美法系的对抗制理念在我国风靡一时。关于何谓“正当程序”，一些对抗制教条逐渐演化为流行叙事，然而其理论预言却时常与我国的司法实践结果相悖。为了理清上述悖论，本书就相关机制进行功能比较研究，并以之为样本检视上述教条在中国是否成立。为了跳出对抗制的论证循环，本书采检察视角，以各国检察官的程序角色和功能作为考查其刑事程序基本宗旨的最主要切面，并从比较法律文化和法律史的角度寻根溯源，发现流行的对抗制教条不但在中国难以成立，即便在其发源地也缺乏足够的理论基础。由此推论：我们应将刑事诉讼程序定义为对真相的官方调查程序，而不是平等的非中立律师之间的私人争端；因此应强调检察官的中立性和主导作用，以及刑事诉讼程序的内部透明性。张帅
1984年生于山东青岛。中国政法大学法学学士，硕士，荷兰乌特勒支大学法学博士。2012 年受国家留学基金资助赴荷兰深造，从事比较刑诉法研究。师从国际刑法协会主席John. Vervaele 教授、欧洲比较刑诉法专家Chrisje Brants教授，以及中国人民大学何家弘教授，并于2017 年取得博士学位。现为上海段和段律师事务所合伙人。

在我国四级法院刑庭均有实习调研经历，对刑事审判实务有较为全面和深入的体会，长期从事相关领域的研究和实践。2018年与荷兰同行一起成立海牙仲裁法庭，致力于在欧洲搭建中文（中国准据法）法律服务平台。2019年加入段和段，负责其海牙分所的筹建工作，同时任乌特勒支大学法学院客座研究员，协调国内外有关单位，就打击跨境网络犯罪以及国内法的域外适用与反制等重点议题展开广泛和深入的学术或实务合作。

目录

中外术语比较辨析 ································································001

1.阅卷与开示 ···························································002

2.审问制与对抗制 ······················································003

3.审判与检察 ···························································004

4.权利与本分 ···························································007

导论 ···················································································008

1.程序透明性与正当性的关系 ·······································008

2.中国的情况 ···························································015

3.研究课题 ······························································018

4.方法论 ·································································029

第一编中国现状

第1章中国现行刑事司法制度的基本理念 ·······························041

1.1 概述 ································································041

1.2 中国刑事诉讼的重要原则 ······································043


XX

刑事程序中的透明性与正当性：摆脱对抗制的教条

1.3 刑事诉讼的主要参与方 ·········································049

第2章中国刑事程序的透明性 ··············································061

2.1 中国普通刑事案件的程序 ······································065

2.2 普通刑事案件的内部透明性 ····································078

第一编小结 ··········································································096

第二编典型的对抗制体系

第3章 “纯正”对抗制的基本宗旨 ········································103

3.1 通例：普通法传统 ···············································103

3.2 理念层面···························································104

3.3 制度层面···························································107

第4章英格兰刑事程序的基本宗旨和内部透明性 ·······················112

4.1 英格兰刑事程序的基本宗旨 ·····································113

4.2 英格兰刑事程序的内部透明性 ·································129

4.3 小结 ································································134

第5章苏格兰刑事程序的基本宗旨和内部透明性 ······················139

5.1 苏格兰刑事程序的基本宗旨 ····································140

5.2 苏格兰刑事程序的内部透明性 ·································145

5.3 小结 ································································149

第6章美国刑事程序的基本宗旨和内部透明性 ·························152

6.1 美国刑事程序的基本宗旨 ······································153

6.2 美国刑事程序的内部透明性 ····································160

6.3 小结 ································································168


XXI

目录

第7章对抗制系统之间的比较 ·············································171

7.1 基本宗旨···························································172

7.2 内部透明性 ························································174

7.3 小结 ································································175

第二编小结 ·········································································177

第三编结论：重新审视

第8章中国经典模式中的正当性和公正司法 ···························181

8.1 中国法律制度的历史背景 ······································181

8.2 中国构建正当性的基本模式 ····································192

8.3 中国传统模式的前景 ············································198

第9章最终结论 ·······························································201

9.1 对比中国和对抗制体系 ·········································202

9.2 未来可行的解决方案 ············································206

9.3 建议方案的可行性和缺陷 ······································213

附录一导师点评 ·································································220

附录二相关外国法条索引 ·····················································234

附录三司法数据统计 ···························································240

后记 ················································································244

参考文献 ·············································································252
内容简介:
来自英美法系的对抗制理念在我国风靡一时。关于何谓“正当程序”，一些对抗制教条逐渐演化为流行叙事，然而其理论预言却时常与我国的司法实践结果相悖。为了理清上述悖论，本书就相关机制进行功能比较研究，并以之为样本检视上述教条在中国是否成立。为了跳出对抗制的论证循环，本书采检察视角，以各国检察官的程序角色和功能作为考查其刑事程序基本宗旨的最主要切面，并从比较法律文化和法律史的角度寻根溯源，发现流行的对抗制教条不但在中国难以成立，即便在其发源地也缺乏足够的理论基础。由此推论：我们应将刑事诉讼程序定义为对真相的官方调查程序，而不是平等的非中立律师之间的私人争端；因此应强调检察官的中立性和主导作用，以及刑事诉讼程序的内部透明性。
作者简介:
张帅
1984年生于山东青岛。中国政法大学法学学士，硕士，荷兰乌特勒支大学法学博士。2012 年受国家留学基金资助赴荷兰深造，从事比较刑诉法研究。师从国际刑法协会主席John. Vervaele 教授、欧洲比较刑诉法专家Chrisje Brants教授，以及中国人民大学何家弘教授，并于2017 年取得博士学位。现为上海段和段律师事务所合伙人。

在我国四级法院刑庭均有实习调研经历，对刑事审判实务有较为全面和深入的体会，长期从事相关领域的研究和实践。2018年与荷兰同行一起成立海牙仲裁法庭，致力于在欧洲搭建中文（中国准据法）法律服务平台。2019年加入段和段，负责其海牙分所的筹建工作，同时任乌特勒支大学法学院客座研究员，协调国内外有关单位，就打击跨境网络犯罪以及国内法的域外适用与反制等重点议题展开广泛和深入的学术或实务合作。
目录:
目录

中外术语比较辨析 ································································001

1.阅卷与开示 ···························································002

2.审问制与对抗制 ······················································003

3.审判与检察 ···························································004

4.权利与本分 ···························································007

导论 ···················································································008

1.程序透明性与正当性的关系 ·······································008

2.中国的情况 ···························································015

3.研究课题 ······························································018

4.方法论 ·································································029

第一编中国现状

第1章中国现行刑事司法制度的基本理念 ·······························041

1.1 概述 ································································041

1.2 中国刑事诉讼的重要原则 ······································043

XX

刑事程序中的透明性与正当性：摆脱对抗制的教条

1.3 刑事诉讼的主要参与方 ·········································049

第2章中国刑事程序的透明性 ··············································061

2.1 中国普通刑事案件的程序 ······································065

2.2 普通刑事案件的内部透明性 ····································078

第一编小结 ··········································································096

第二编典型的对抗制体系

第3章 “纯正”对抗制的基本宗旨 ········································103

3.1 通例：普通法传统 ···············································103

3.2 理念层面···························································104

3.3 制度层面···························································107

第4章英格兰刑事程序的基本宗旨和内部透明性 ·······················112

4.1 英格兰刑事程序的基本宗旨 ·····································113

4.2 英格兰刑事程序的内部透明性 ·································129

4.3 小结 ································································134

第5章苏格兰刑事程序的基本宗旨和内部透明性 ······················139

5.1 苏格兰刑事程序的基本宗旨 ····································140

5.2 苏格兰刑事程序的内部透明性 ·································145

5.3 小结 ································································149

第6章美国刑事程序的基本宗旨和内部透明性 ·························152

6.1 美国刑事程序的基本宗旨 ······································153

6.2 美国刑事程序的内部透明性 ····································160

6.3 小结 ································································168

XXI

目录

第7章对抗制系统之间的比较 ·············································171

7.1 基本宗旨···························································172

7.2 内部透明性 ························································174

7.3 小结 ································································175

第二编小结 ·········································································177

第三编结论：重新审视

第8章中国经典模式中的正当性和公正司法 ···························181

8.1 中国法律制度的历史背景 ······································181

8.2 中国构建正当性的基本模式 ····································192

8.3 中国传统模式的前景 ············································198

第9章最终结论 ·······························································201

9.1 对比中国和对抗制体系 ·········································202

9.2 未来可行的解决方案 ············································206

9.3 建议方案的可行性和缺陷 ······································213

附录一导师点评 ·································································220

附录二相关外国法条索引 ·····················································234

附录三司法数据统计 ···························································240

后记 ················································································244

参考文献 ·············································································252

查看详情

刑事程序中的透明性与正当性——摆脱对抗制的教条

内容简介:

作者简介:

目录: